Skip to content

City Night Songs

March 12, 2012
by

Event: “City Night Songs” by Checkpoint Theatre and NUS Stage (as part of the NUS Arts Festival 2012)
Venue: UCC Theatre
Run: 10th – 11th Mar 2012

Because The Night Belongs To Lovers

The very notion of nightfall lends itself well to thoughts and expressions of the poetic nature, and being a lover of the night myself, I attended “City Nights Songs” with eager anticipation.

It didn’t help that the online buzz on Twitter and Facebook after opening night last night was rather enthusiastic, which made me even more excited to watch it, although the only caveat that kept popping up was that the show was too lengthy.

This production is a collaboration between Checkpoint Theatre and NUS Stage, and I love how theatre professionals have been given the opportunity to work with talented young students and vice versa.

It is directed by Huzir Sulaiman, while the script and songs are a collaborative effort by the entire cast, consisting of Gani Abdul Karim, Oon Shu An, Nessa Anwar, Judy Au, Nishant Jalgaonkar, Ivan Surya Tjahyo, and Joel Tan.

I liked that the programme booklet to “City Night Songs” was rather informative, and that it had included the all-important song list, which is the one bit of crucial information that I always turn to in a, uh, “musical” such as this (more on this point a little later).

One minor gripe I had with the “Sing to the Dawn” programme booklet was that it didn’t mention anything about the titles of the songs, which made it extremely difficult to keep track of the songs.

I know this might seem like petty semantics, but I would prefer to classify “City Night Songs” as a play with songs (hence my classification of this review under the “plays” category), rather than a full-fledged musical, even though its run-time of 2 hours 45 mins rivals even that of most Broadway musicals.

It is essentially a weaving together of different life stories affecting 7 friends as they negotiate their way through the treacherous landscape of urban city life.

Even though the songs portray the emotions of the characters rather well, you’d find that they aren’t actually fully integrated into the fabric of the play, and tend to be performed as short scenes on their own.

I liked the opening scene, which saw the entire ensemble coming out and performing the musical number “Voices Call Me Home” as a 7-piece band.

It showcased the varied musical abilities of the cast, as we see that Joel Tan plays the piano really well (not to mention the trumpet and trombone in subsequent songs), Gani does percussions, Nishant plays guitar, Ivan plays bass, and so on.

I thought “Voices Call Me Home” had this slight spiritual quality to it, almost like how “Circle of Life” works for the opening of “The Lion King”.

Musically, I thought the cast did rather well for the number “Warna-Warni”, which to me was the best-performed number by the ensemble, and which incidentally also garnered the strongest reception.

Sadly, the musical execution was generally found wanting for many of the songs, and I am fully aware that we obviously have to take into account the fact that the performers are all actors first, musicians second.

However – and I don’t know if I’m alone in thinking this way – I felt that there were points in which the poor musical execution actually detracted from the appreciation of the song, and to a larger extent, the play.

It was a distraction that was just too jarring to ignore.

The main issue was synchronisation between the various instruments, and while I do not wish to pinpoint any specific instruments, I would point out that the songs “If God Wants Me To Love Him” and “By My Side” were especially problematic.

“If God Wants Me To Love Him” also suffered from pitch issues, especially in the beginning part of the song, and took awhile to find its feet.

Nonetheless, this was the first time I had ever seen all the actors in a production actually play all the instrumental music to their own songs, and I thought it was a remarkably refreshing experience.

The cast was fortunate, in a way, as it received tremendously warm response from the audience throughout the play, which could partly be explained by the fact that a lot of the audience members were probably fellow NUS mates.

This warm response probably gave the performers the confidence and the motivation to also raise their game on stage, which resulted in the entire production being an extremely engaging experience.

However, this is not to say the playscript itself did not have the quality to match.

I found it incredibly funny when it wanted to be, and achingly poignant when it had to be.

The writing was generally top-notch, and I found “City Night Songs” to be one of the funniest plays I’d seen in awhile.

At times it almost seemed like a pastiche of theatre styles, what with heartfelt, tender moments to expletive-filled rants to comedic banter to exceedingly flowery monologues.

The plot was made up of the various storylines pertaining to the 7 characters, chronicling their search for friendship, love and meaning…something like an extended episode of “Friends” if you will.

There wasn’t anything especially complex about the plotlines.

They were largely simple and rather predictable, and ultimately, given the relative thinness of the plotlines, it didn’t feel to me like the play would have warranted the run-time of 2 hours 45 mins.

Yes, I do agree that the play’s duration could perhaps have been shortened.

If not for the fact that the performers were playing in front of a raucous home crowd, I wonder if the audience would not have felt it to be too draggy.

I enjoyed the performance of Judy Au very much, in the way she was able to demonstrate a range of acting ability.

Her Hong Kong impersonations were spot-on, and her comedic persona was unbearably funny, at times reminding me very much of Zooey Deschanel’s character from “500 Days of Summer”.

Joel Tan was just as impressive, and there seems to be no end to this young man’s myriad of talents – playwright, actor, musical director, composer, pianist, trumpeter, trombonist, etc.

The final song “The Best We Can Do”, sung by Joel and Shu An, was one of my favourites.

Amongst all the songs in “City Night Songs”, it most resembled a Broadway song in its conception, its lyrics and its melody.

The lyrics were incredibly witty, and the tune somehow made me think of Sondheim’s “Send in the Clowns” for some strange reason.

According to Huzir Sulaiman, the actual collaborative writing of “City Night Songs” only started 8 weeks ago.

And it just boggles the mind when you think about how much has been accomplished within this span of 8 weeks.

Hats off to the fine young talents of NUS Stage for what they’ve come up with, and to the professionals involved in the production as well for sharing their time and expertise.

I found “City Night Songs” to be extremely refreshing, engaging, and encouraging, and I deeply look forward to watching more of such collaborations in future.

I Theatre Presents “Sing to the Dawn”

March 10, 2012
by

Event: “Sing to the Dawn” presented by I Theatre
Venue: Drama Centre Theatre
Run: 5th – 19th Mar 2012

Unfulfilled Ambitions

It always excites me whenever there is a new local musical production being put up, especially one with new original songs.

My familiarity with “Sing to the Dawn” can be considered low to medium at best, having never read the classic Ho Minfong O-level text nor seen the Dick Lee stage musical.

The only time I’d ever come across “Sing to the Dawn” was when I made the ill-fated decision to watch the 2008 animated movie, which duly reconfigured my impressions of the local animated film industry, and not in a good way.

I have also been familiar with that one gem of a song from Dick Lee’s “Sing to the Dawn” stage musical called “When All The Tears Have Dried”, which, in my opinion, is one of Dick Lee’s finest tunes from all the musicals he’s ever composed for.

Now on to this latest iteration of the fabled tale…

Firstly, kudos to Brian Seward and I Theatre for attempting to put up a project like this.

From reading the programme booklet itself, you can see that a lot of effort and commitment has been put into this production as it is staged at the Drama Centre Theatre and features Bang Wenfu as composer/arranger, 53A’s Sara Wee as musical director (interesting choice!), the talented Eucien Chia as set designer, and so on.

The lovely Isabella Chiam stars as lead character Dawan, while relative fresh face Jonathan Lum (who bears more than a passing resemblance to CNA newscaster Timothy Go) plays her brother Kwai.

Then there are also the familiar faces of Dwayne Lau, Siti Khalijah, Andrew Lua, and so on.

Just a side note: Do not be mistaken – this is not a restaging of the Dick Lee musical.

This is a brand new production with brand new songs composed by Bang Wenfu.

(By the way, anyone knows who did the lyrics? I’m guessing Brian Seward, but it was not explicitly stated in the programme booklet.)

The musical tells the story of a young village girl Dawan and her relationship with her brother, and how she by virtue of being the top student secures the village’s only scholarship to study in the city at the expense of her brother, who incidentally scored second highest.

And thus, the entire musical portrays the conflict and struggle Dawan goes through as she deals with strong gender prejudices while also having to think in the best interest of her brother, and ultimately, of her entire family.

Does she break the mould of social convention and forge ahead with her dream of studying in the big city, or does she take a step back and let her brother Kwai have the chance to do so, since he’d probably get more mileage out of it anyway?

I liked how this show remained true to the tenets of musical theatre.

I liked the reflective opening scene, where we are first introduced to the two main characters and their hopes and dreams.

I liked the closing number of the first act, which was very “West Side Story” in the way it brought together the different groups of characters onto the same stage while altogether singing the very dramatic and climactic closing song.

It gave a resounding sense of finality to the first act, yet with a foreboding sense of suspense saved for the second act, just the way the first act of a musical should end.

I also liked how there was a good balance of ballads, up-tempo numbers, and quirky songs throughout the entire musical.

Although I daren’t say that I was able to remember many of the tunes upon walking out of the theatre, I would have to praise Bang Wenfu for his highly inventive musical arrangements for the various songs.

Unfortunately, I Theatre’s “Sing to the Dawn” did also suffer from a number of shortcomings.

I got the sense throughout the performance that the audience was not completely drawn into the proceedings.

I can’t say this for a fact, but after going to so many shows, you can somewhat tell whether an audience is into a show or not.

And from the general body language of the audience around me, it didn’t seem to me like the audience was as emotionally involved in the proceedings as I would have hoped they would be, and neither was I.

I suppose it could be the fact that I Theatre’s “Sing to the Dawn” couldn’t decide for itself if it would play to children or to adults, and it ended up being in a strange no man’s land whereby the target audience could not be suitably determined.

Laughs were few and far between, and even if they occurred it was usually as a result of Audrey Luo’s comedic antics, which worked pretty well for the kids.

The big city scene which portrayed a rather scantily-dressed nightclub dancer in the background seemed a tad out of place due to its overtly explicit nature, and while no one would have bat an eyelid if this were any other theatre production meant for adults, it just seemed instinctively incongruous here considering the entire show up till that point seemed to be selling itself as a piece of children’s theatre, or at least for young people.

Jonathan Lum put in a wonderful performance, both in acting and singing, and might probably be one to watch out for in the near future.

Isabella Chiam was remarkable as well, having to play the lead role and portray all the anguish and conflict that Dawan had to go through, although in the singing department she perhaps might not have been as competent as some of the others in the cast.

I don’t mean to criticise anyone, and I don’t know if it was just my imagination, but for the first few songs in the show, I thought some parts of some of the songs sounded a tad off-key.

Overall, this production seemed to lack that emotional hook which would reel you into a story and make you want to be invested in it.

For some strange reason it just made you feel somewhat detached from the proceedings.

Also, the “rule of Chekhov’s gun” comes to mind for this production in the way it set up the whole notion of the oppressive landlord in the first few scenes (there was even a song about him, although we never actually get to see him), and how he is demanding rent in the form of sacks of rice from the poor villagers…and yet from the second act onwards we neither see nor hear from this mysterious landlord character ever again.

It just felt like one of the story elements which you thought would have been developed, but never was.

I can’t say I was mesmerised or even engaged by “Sing to the Dawn”, but I will say that I fully appreciate the efforts of I Theatre in bringing to us a brand new musical version of the revered text which has been read by generations of schoolkids past and present.

It is always an enormous undertaking to put up a new musical, especially one with new original songs, and in that respect I think we’ve got a lot to thank I Theatre for.

Coming Soon: Trainstopping!

March 3, 2012
by

Event: “Trainstopping – The Year in Revue 2011” by Sight Lines Productions
Venue: Chamber @ The Arts House
Run: 26th Apr – 3rd May 2012

Trainstopping” is a comedy musical revue put together as a tongue-in-cheek response to the amusing events in Singapore the past year, with special attention given to…yup, you guessed it – trains!

It stars the very talented Siti Khalijah (“Hossan Leong Show”, “Gemuk Girls”, “Model Citizen”), Darius Tan (“Fried Rice Paradise”, “Aladdin”), and Celine Rosa Tan (“Forbidden City”, “The Full Monty”).

The show is directed by Derrick Chew, and is written by yours truly (Jeremy Yew).

We are all very excited about this production and we look forward to having you join us to share in the fun and laughter.

Blurb:Trainstopping is the year’s zaniest, wackiest and Wicked-iest look-back at the craziest happenings in Singapore. With hilarious songs & skits skewering everything from SMRT train delays to the all-too-predictable Orchard Road floods (uh, ponds); a fresh take on recent hit musicals “Spring Awakening” and “Wicked”; a homage to our nation’s fascination with curry (and curry sauce!); a nod to the irresistible A&F male greeters and a round-up of the most ridiculous quotes ever made in the press. And for all ye When Tan Meets Tan fans – a special erections elections segment that will surely make you go high and hard (your laughter, that is).

It’s the hilarious revue show where craziness reigns and all sense of sanity simply goes out the glass window (not before shattering it to pieces, of course). So buckle up and get ready to be taken for a ride, because Trainstopping will make you laugh your guts out so much, you’ll need cable ties to hold them back together! Oh, and remember: You can still – LOVE YOUR RIDE!”

Tickets can be purchased from Bytes (here).

Trainstopping” has also recently been featured on The Online Citizen (here) and (here).

For more information on the show, please visit sightlines.com.sg or its Facebook page (here).

WANNA WIN A PAIR OF FREE TICKETS TO TRAINSTOPPING?

Simply LIKE their Facebook page (here) and stand a chance to win a pair of tickets to the Gala performance of “Trainstopping” worth $100!

Tongues

March 3, 2012
by

photo credit: Jason Wee

Event: “Tongues” by Jason Wee and Sean Tobin
Festival: M1 Singapore Fringe Festival’12 : Art & Faith
Venue: Gallery Theatre, National Museum of Singapore
Run: 16-19 February 2012
Cast: Nora Samosir, Serena Ho, Walter Hanna, Faizal Abdullah


M1 Fringe Fest ended last weekend and with much delay, here’s a short write-up of another play I caught. I wasn’t quite sure what I should make of it.
It had an unconventional structure in its presentation, which in my personal opinion, might not have been the best way.

The gist of it:
As the morgue temperature rises, 4 corpses awake in the midst of waiting for their identification and autopsy. As the temperature falls again (this happens a few times), they are thrown into dream-like scenarios and each different as the scene jumps.

Starting off in a casual manner to “get the audience involved”, it was on the outset that it was probably meant to be that way, having the actors stroll into the theatre, and even “cuts” called by the director in the ongoing play. However, I found this too disruptive to the play, almost like it was a rehearsal, causing a jarring effect to the flow. I felt it would have been more impactful without those interruptions. Also, due to the many abrupt shifts in characters, it was a bit difficult to find the story behind each one, as it seems only snapshots were taken. Maybe it’s meant to be this way, that dream-like scenario.

The religious theme was apparent, and at times, maybe even “offensive” or viewed as a mockery, inducing, I believe, some of the audience to walk out. Yes, it was a tad uncomfortable at some points, but I wanted to hear them out.
In the post-show dialogue, I found out that the inspiration came from Sean’s religious environment since young and also as a “compilation” of interviews and surveys with people and their views. It was meant to raise questions on what people think about religion, not a personal commentary on the part of both writers. I do wonder why the show was called “Tongues” though? Maybe due to the many voices of people? Or as corpses, there are many questions that you can no longer ask? Anything to do with the Tower of Babel?

One thing I liked about the show was the sound design by Dirk Stromberg. With its “surround” quality, it helped the audience through the scenes and I liked the way it was engineered. I also felt that the repeated scene at the end of “are you there, God?”, where one of the characters seeks answers from God, but doesn’t hear His replies even though He was there replying, was a nice touch. It had a somewhat different quality as compared to the earlier “interrupted” instance; I think the repeat made that poignant touch to the show.

So there, I guess that’s all I have for this show. Just another note, the book (published by Math Paper Press, 2012) was launched last Friday (24 Feb) at BooksActually.

Cooling Off Day (The Restaging)

March 1, 2012
by

Event: “Cooling Off Day” by W!ld Rice (originally staged in August ’11)
Venue: SOTA Drama Theatre
Run: 23rd Feb – 11th Mar 2012

Relight My Fire

You could say that most of the dust has already settled by now.

It’s funny, but when you think about it, it has actually been less than 10 months since the 2011 General Elections, but a lot of it does seem like quite a distant memory now.

How quickly we forget.

However, W!ld Rice must really thank their lucky stars for the recent shenanigans involving a certain Hougang MP, which paves the way for a likely by-election in the near future, thus bringing a whole new level of relevance and timeliness to “Cooling Off Day” once again.

“Cooling Off Day” was first staged in August last year as part of the Man Singapore Theatre Festival.

I had already done a lengthy review of the initial staging (here), and since it doesn’t seem like too much has been changed in this restaging (apart from the fact that Janice Koh now replaces Tan Kheng Hua), I shan’t dwell too much on the main content of the play itself.

I would, however, like to share some random thoughts I had on watching the play earlier this evening:

– This was my first time visiting the SOTA Drama Theatre, and I was suitably impressed. Slightly smaller than the Drama Centre Theatre from the looks of it, but it had that cosy feel, which I liked. And the interior colour scheme gave it a very vibrant and energetic feel. It’s heartening to know that there has been another good-class theatre added to our local pool of theatre venues. I look forward to attending more shows at this venue.

– Part of “Cooling Off Day’s” charm lies in its heavy use of caricaturism. And credit obviously goes to the six fine actors for making many of the lines much funnier than they would have seemed at first glance.

– Janice Koh is a dead ringer for Tan Kheng Hua. At times the resemblance is almost uncanny, both physically and in their acting style. Wonderful replacement.

– The opening skit still gets me every time. I’m not sure if anyone else out there feels the same, but I just loved every bit of the opening skit where the female student ruminates on why we should simply vote for the opposition and not for the ruling party. Very rational and coherent thoughts from a young girl. I thought this skit was especially notable because it kicks off the show, and yet kind of stumps the viewer for that brief moment because the viewer is probably expecting a show filled with “anti-PAP” rant.

– Nothing unites a theatre crowd quite like anti-PAP rhetoric. Is there such a thing as a PAP-voting theatre-goer? (I’m just kidding.)

– As I said, the 2011 General Election seems like quite a distant memory now, and I got the sense that “Cooling Off Day” helped remind us of some of the finer details of last year which we had almost forgotten about by now. And it also rekindled some of the fire that burned rather brightly in us last year, albeit for an intense few weeks.

– The Mr Brown “Bak Chor Mee” skit just never fails to deliver. As it was back in August last year, it once again brought the house down earlier this evening. Who cares if the Tin Pei Ling gag has been flogged to death? Or the “once every fifty years” line for that matter? This skit was easily the comedic zenith of the entire show.

– Some parts I didn’t understand: Shouldn’t it be “81 out of 87 seats” instead of “81 out of 90 seats” as mentioned by one of the characters in the play? Also, why did Jo Kukathas mention something about those words being said in “1999”, and then saying that that was “20 years ago”? Not trying to nitpick here, but I believe I was not the only one wondering about the same things.

– Again, I didn’t really get the whole “Easterners vs. Westerners” rhetoric which seemed to feature so heavily in the play. Didn’t think it was particularly resonant last August, and don’t think it’s particularly resonant now either.

– The last scene of “Cooling Off Day” is, of course, that highly-memorable and visually-arresting set of 81 white chairs and 6 red chairs all lined up neatly on stage. When I first saw it earlier this evening, my first thought was “Ah, but it’s no longer 6 red chairs!” And true enough, later on after the applause, Neo Swee Lin went to symbolically remove one of the red chairs. Brilliant. Just brilliant.

“Singapore” by The Necessary Stage

February 19, 2012
by

Event: “Singapore” by The Necessary Stage
Venue: Esplanade Theatre Studio
Run: 15th – 19th Feb 2012

First staged during last year’s Singapore Arts Festival, TNS’s rather ambitiously titled offering “Singapore” is a curious one.

It’s hard to put a finger on it really.

I had unfortunately missed last year’s staging, and thus am unable to make any comparisons between that first staging and this current one, but I gathered from the post-show dialogue session that the main differences were the changes made to the final segment of the play.

“Singapore”, starring the likes of Sharon Frese, Najib Soiman, Rodney Oliveiro, Siti Khalijah, Karen Tan, and Sukania Venugopal, consists of three distinct segments – the first being an enactment of William Farquhar’s time in Singapore and his relationship with his wife Nonio, the second being a meta-play about a group of theatre practitioners trying to put together a play about a group of Singaporeans being tasked to rewrite the national pledge, and the last one being a scene where these same practitioners engage in some internal conflict with regards to their little theatre group.

The production started out briskly enough.

There was enough momentum going on in the earlier proceedings that made you think that it would have led to something really great.

The first segment was certainly entertaining, but after awhile you started to ask yourself if there was a real point to be made here at all.

The second segment, which to me was the main focus of the entire production, felt slightly more meaningful.

Humour was largely provided through the abilities of the strong cast and how they executed the various caricatures, be it local or foreign characters, to maximum effect.

Things started to get a bit convoluted once you realised you were watching a meta-play whereby it is actually a play about a group of practitioners rehearsing a play.

The lines between reality and fantasy were well and truly crossed when after the second segment, the actors came forward and pretended to conduct a post-show dialogue, and some members in the audience actually thought it was the real post-show dialogue itself!

Don’t get me wrong, I’m as big a fan of TNS as the next guy because I think they put up some of the most wonderful and engaging stuff you can find, but I wonder if they might have dropped the ball on this one.

Probably not their best work.

Yes, the whole “locals vs foreigners” sentiment was brought to the fore once again, at times in such raw and brutal fashion that it made you wince, but apart from that, I came out of the theatre scratching my head trying to grasp the essence of “Singapore” in the way it was presented as a whole.

Plus, the inclusion of the song bits, while highly entertaining, just didn’t seem to make a whole lot of sense apart from providing comic relief.

“Singapore” seemed more like a strange mishmash of ideas, of styles, and of dynamics.

And in the same way Singapore the nation is a mishmash of all of the above, I’m not sure if it has necessarily led to desirable results.

P.S. On a completely separate note altogether, I’m thankful to TNS for featuring the Carpenters song “I Won’t Last A Day Without You”, sung by Siti in the first segment, purely from a self-interest standpoint. It’s a wonderful song which I had not previously been familiar with, but am now liking very much. Thanks guys!

“Singapore” by TNS

February 18, 2012
by

Event: “Singapore” by The Necessary Stage
Festival: M1 Singapore Fringe Festival’12 : Art & Faith
Venue: Esplanade Theatre Studio
Run: 15-19 February 2012
Written by: Haresh Sharma
Directed by: Alvin Tan
Cast: Rodney Oliveiro, Karen Tan, Siti Khalijah, Najip Soiman, Sukania Venugopal, Sharon Frese

.

Having missed the first staging at last year’s Singapore Arts Festival, I thought I shouldn’t miss it this time around.

The show comprised of 3 acts (without intermission). The play started out with their take on the history of Singapore, of William Farquhar and others like the wife he left behind we don’t often feature in our history (you mean he had a wife here?). Raffles was kind of out of the picture. How much was fact or fiction? That would be up to our interpretation. Moving on to more modern times in the later act, there was a play within the play (and was perhaps one reason why one of the audience members got confused during an interactive session during the play).

The actors were given quite a fair space to improvise and show their versatility in playing multiple characters, although the accents were sometimes not so convincing. However, I think the cast did well in playing the myriad of roles and personally, I didn’t have a big problem in identifying who was who at the various points in time. A lot of improvisation was going on and I think the cast had good dynamics with each other.

The “migration” theme was clear from the beginning till the end, when foreigners came (i.e. Raffles and gang) and till the current day; Singapore then and now. However, certain things became a little clearer after the post-show dialogue. Haresh talked about how the play was putting together S Rajaratnam’s vision of The Pledge (which he wrote) and it helped put things into perspective. What makes us Singaporean, and what makes us to be in harmony with others. It is true isn’t it that there are those who choose to leave if they are able to, while there are those who choose to stay in Singapore, because we have only this home and believe this is our only home. But I guess this migration tension will continue on even as it has gone on for centuries.

Also, it came to me that the need to have our voice heard kind of justifies or proves our existence. From William Farquhar’s wife (if she existed) to raising our views in the present day as citizens.

I didn’t quite enjoy the earlier part of the show as much as I would have liked though. It was funny, but it was almost bordering on slapstick and felt a little flighty. Well, I guess it makes it light after a day’s work for the audience and a deviation from the deeper stuff produced by TNS, but I still prefer Haresh Sharma with his more thought-provoking and “intense” plays that have their humour on a different level. The show did start to progress a little deeper in the later acts but I think the climax boiled down to the ending with an emotional outburst by Deb (played by Karen Tan) which at least rounded up the show in a good way (we were told this was not the way it ended during SAF last year).

On a side note, I was quite irritated by someone’s phone ringing (for what must have been 2 minutes) at one of the more important points of the show, when Rodney was delivering a “passionate speech” as a role of a role. The cast seemed fully aware of it (but the show went on) and you could tell the rest of the audience were getting irritated as well (yes, it was that long and distracting). I couldn’t fully concentrate on what Rodney was saying and it affected my feel of the conclusion a little as Karen made reference to it.

Coming Soon: “Saying Grace” by TheatreWorks’ Writers’ Lab

February 13, 2012
by

Event: “Saying Grace” (a TheatreWorks Writers’ Lab Community Project)
Performed by Andrew Lua

Written by Hu Fangda
Directed by Gerald Chew

Message from TheatreWorks:

“Andrew Harvey Lee is seemingly perfect: educated, married, hardworking, a corporate high-flyer.

He wants to live well like other Singaporeans do.

But he eats and purges himself too much.

A prize-winning entry of the 24-Hour Playwriting Competition 2011 (Youth Category), Saying Grace traces the life of an accountant battling an eating disorder.

Follow Andrew’s fall from grace as he negotiates his body, career, family and sanity through a deep plunge past rock bottom.

A tussle of mind over matter, society above self, this one-man show offers a rare perspective into the private world of a man who has lived, lost and hopes to live again.”

Event Details:

FREE ADMISSION
Performed in English
Approximately 40 minutes
Post-show discussion after each performance
Recommended for audiences 15 years and above

18 Feb 2012, Sat, 3pm & 8pm
Performance Centre, Mountbatten Community Club

25 & 26 Feb 2012, Sat & Sun, 3pm
Programme Zone, Bedok Public Library

11 Mar 2012, Sun, 3pm
Merpati Hall, Geylang East Public Library

18 Mar 2012, Sun, 4pm
Mini Theatre, Braddell Heights Community Club

24 Mar 2012, Sat, 7:30pm
Multi-Purpose Hall, Siglap South Community Centre

25 Mar 2012, Sun, 3pm & 27 Mar 2012, Tue, 7:30pm
Programme Zone, Serangoon Public Library

30 Mar 2012, Fri, 8pm
Theatrette, Marine Parade Community Club

To reserve seats or for enquiries, please call TheatreWorks at 6737-7213 or email tworks@singnet.com.sg.

In Partnership With South East Community Development Council
Community Outreach Sponsored By Tan Chin Tuan Foundation
With Support From National Arts Council
Venue Partners People’s Association, National Library Board

Coming Soon: NUS Theatre Studies Presents “The Velveteen Rabbit”

February 13, 2012
by

Event: “The Velveteen Rabbit” by NUS Theatre Studies Programme (a commemorative 20th Anniversary Production)
Venue: Play Den @ The Arts House
Run: 15th – 17th March 2012

Message from NUS Theatre Studies Programme:

“The TS Program turns 20 this year.

For its 20th Anniversary Production, which Dr K K Seet will be producing as his swan song before he retires at long last, the play chosen is the stage adaptation of the canonical children’s classic, The Velveteen Rabbit.

A sweet, heartwarming and affirmative tale of identity, the redemptive power of love and what it means to be REAL to someone, The Velveteen Rabbit has special resonance in our postmodern world of meaningless, transactional relationships and the contemporary order of the simulacra.

A play of both commemorative and artistic value, it is suitable entertainment for both the entire family and avid patrons of the arts.

“Real isn’t how you are made,” said the Skin Horse. “It’s a thing that happens to you. When a child loves you for a long, long time, not just to play with, but REALLY loves you, then you become Real.”

“Does it hurt?” asked the Rabbit.

“Sometimes,” said the Skin Horse, for he was always truthful. “When you are Real you don’t mind being hurt.”

Keep an evening free on March 15 -17 and commemorate the 20th Anniversary of the TS Program with us.

Tickets are at $25 each, and a total of four shows are scheduled for:
8pm, March 15-17
3pm, March 17

Please purchase tickets by emailing nusthevelveteenrabbit@gmail.com with your name, phone number, number of tickets, and preferred slot.

Tickets are also available from the Arts House (here).

The tickets can be collected at the door.

Please arrive 30 minutes before to collect your tickets, and provide your mobile number for identification.

Neither refund nor exchange of tickets is allowed once purchase is confirmed.

The show is free seating.

Hoping to see you there!”

Spring Awakening

February 12, 2012
by

Event: “Spring Awakening” by Pangdemonium Productions
Venue: Drama Centre Theatre
Run: 3rd – 26th Feb 2012
Book & Lyrics: Steven Sater
Music: Duncan Sheik

It was raw. Yup, that’s the word that came to mind. Raw.

A raw display of the road to self- and sexual discovery of a group of teenagers set in an German bourgeois society of the late 19th century. Raw too in the psychological and emotional upheavals as innocent youths bordering on uncertain awareness; of how to feel and how to cope with expectations and conventions. It’s getting in touch with that rocky and intense side to the coming of age.

What greeted me first was the beautiful set. Pangdemonium’s (or rather Eucien Chia’s design) sets have never failed to enthrall audiences, especially in that amazing set-up for Dealer’s Choice. How would I describe it? Exquisite yet functional. This was also the case. The church frame, platforms, and oh, I liked the props too, especially the chairs with their storage compartment under the seat. The stage felt larger than life actually as it seemed to contain us as well, in the internal structure of the skeletal frame. Very up-close, especially for the stall seat holders. I guess that contributed to the intensity of the mood. The hidden-mic-in-jacket stints were also quite nifty, and at some points adding humour to the show.

Of the actors, Eden Ang’s ‘Moritz’ was one of those who stood out. I was pretty impressed by his acrobatic moves earlier in the act, probably because of his break-dancing background (yes, I know that’s not the point), but his portrayal of the frustrated-by-puberty Moritz was equally commendable, drawing laughter and spice and was greatly missed due to his unfortunate and uncalled for end. His character was by far the most vibrant and explosive and I think he did very well in portraying that. Woah, and the slaps Adrian Pang (as Moritz’s father) gave him, not once, but twice. The sound was pretty loud. Imagine that for the whole run! Personally, I liked the segment when he did “And Then There Were None” as well. In general, I felt the cast were relatively natural in their roles.

The most moving scene to me has got to be the funeral scene as Nathan Hartono’s (as Melchior) tender rendition of “Left Behind” left me with tears rolling down my cheeks. The scene also ended on a heartbreaking note of a father who broke down in grief, out of a love he never got to show and regret. Come to think of it, the death of Moritz marked the end of a more lively life among the teenagers as he was the one who was usually full of zest, but was unexpectedly the one who went down the road of suicide, a victim of an unfair system. I felt his death was the turning point of the show as everything just spiraled downwards from there.
And seeing the father of Moritz and the mother of Wendla, adults are just as clueless or unsure of dealing with their children. The society back then is not much different from now actually, between parents and their children. There is always that disparity that needs to be resolved, if it can be resolved.

However, I felt the scene of “Those You’ve Known” near the end brought a bit of hope, yet at the same time, it brought awareness that at that point, Melchior truly came of age and stepped into adulthood, not by choice, but by the hard and tragic truths of life. Life must go on.

I liked how the show ended with “The Song of Purple Summer” as it brought me back to the opening scene when the 3 of them (Melchior, Moritz and Wendla) were still kids and Melchior was writing a song about summer…

from spring to summer the age has passed… (random)