Skip to content


September 12, 2010

Talking about monologues, what does it take for someone to play a monologue?

Depending on the book, it seems like a display of schizophrenia on stage. How do you appear convincing switching between roles? It’s difficult to get into character for each since you have to be mindful about switching roles during the act. So the actor will need a certain amount of tenacity.

I can’t help but think of Emily of Emerald Hill, a rather well-known local monologue play. Margaret Chan did a pretty good job (I’ve not seen others, but will catch the Ivan Heng’s portrayal that’s showing next year). I realised that it was essentially playing the same character, except at different stages of Emily’s life. The audience needs to “transport” themselves along with the character. So does this makes it easier? A single character portrayal?

I believe the book plays a part too. You need a defining characteristic of each persona, which will need to be drawn from the book. So the actor will need to pick out that defining characteristic to emphasize, and use it to his/her advantage so that the audience can tell when the actor switches.

Just some thoughts.

One Comment leave one →
  1. Jeremy permalink*
    September 13, 2010 2:30 pm

    I guess good actors would inevitably be better at monologues than weaker ones. It’s just a natural extension of being able to play a certain character well, I suppose. If you need to play more than one character, then it definitely helps to make them as distinct as possible (speech, tone, mannerisms, posture, etc), which was something Margaret Chan was able to do brilliantly.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: